Liver transplantation with vena cava in situ and selective use of temporary portacaval shunt or portal clamping

Citation
Ge. Gerunda et al., Liver transplantation with vena cava in situ and selective use of temporary portacaval shunt or portal clamping, HEP-GASTRO, 48(38), 2001, pp. 486-492
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology","da verificare
Journal title
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
01726390 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
38
Year of publication
2001
Pages
486 - 492
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-6390(200103/04)48:38<486:LTWVCI>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Background/Aims: The recipient hepatectomy with vena cava in situ in liver transplantation has overcome the need of venous-venous bypass thanks tempor ary ports caval shunt or portal clamping. Methodology: 150 orthotopic liver transplants in 137 patients were performe d and the vena cava in situ technique was used in 142 (venous bypass in 7, temporary ports caval shunt in 49, portal clamping in 87). The suprahepatic cava veins anastomosis was performed with Belghiti in 97 and piggyback tec hniques in 45. Results: There were no differences in operative and warm ischemia times nor in blood requirements, while a greater stability of body temperature was d ocumented in the vena cava In Situ group: in the latter temporary ports cav al shunt preserved the temperature better than portal clamping (P <0.01). I n anhepatic phase mean artery pressure decreased in veno-venous bypass and increased in the vena cava In situ groups (P<0.01). The venous return and t he cardiac performances (anhepatic phase) were better preserved in the vena cava In Situ group. (P<less than>0.0001). Conclusions: Temporary portal caval shunt or portal clamping and piggyback or Belgiti Techniques allow a better hemodynamic stability through out the procedure, obviating the need for veno-venous bypass or fluid overload, if selectively used.