Today's SMES related efforts are mainly concentrating on a number of small-
scale devices for high value applications such as improving power quality a
nd providing frequency control or dynamic response. The commercialised SMES
units utilise NbTi at 4.2 It as a coil material. In addition some demonstr
ation concepts have been tested with HTS materials operating at 20-30 K or
even at 77 K, One approach is to utilise Nb3Sn in the vicinity of 10 g. Thi
s kind of system has been constructed. The designed SMES coil is compared t
o a NbTi coil tooled with liquid helium and a conduction cooled BSCCO coil
operating at 20 K, The starting point is a 200 W magnet where the coil volu
me has been optimised under electromagnetic and mechanical constraints. The
comparison of these three coil concepts is mainly concentrated on the ques
tions of stability and coil protection. The benefits and disadvantages of a
dopting Nb3Sn as a coil material are emphasized.