Mobile multicast with routing optimization for recipient mobility

Authors
Citation
Jr. Lai et Wj. Liao, Mobile multicast with routing optimization for recipient mobility, IEEE CONS E, 47(1), 2001, pp. 199-206
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Eletrical & Eletronics Engineeing
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS
ISSN journal
00983063 → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
199 - 206
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-3063(200102)47:1<199:MMWROF>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
This paper explores the issues of multicasting for mobile hosts using IETF Mobile IF. Mobile IP suggests two approaches for mobile multicasting, namel y, remote subscription (MIP-RS) and bi-directional tunneling (MIP-BT). Whil e having the advantage of optimal routing efficiency, MIP-RS uses a naive j oin-and-leave policy for mobile hosts to participate in the groups of inter est and causes serious packet losses while roaming. MIP-BT is free from pac ket losses due to roaming; however, MIP-BT and its modification MoM suffer from the triangle routing problem resulting in inefficient routing and wast age of system resources. In this paper, we propose a new mobile multicastin g protocol called Mobile Multicast with Routing OPtimization (MMROP) that e mploys a modified join-and-leave mechanism, and routes the missing data seq uence due to the "out-of-synch" problem to other agents in the adjacent net works via tunneling for roaming terminals. With MMROP, the mobility agent ( foreign or home agent) in Mobile IF, in addition to mobility management, is extended to assist multicasting for mobiles. The mobility agent is not nec essarily a multicast router. From the perspective of the multicast router, the mobility agent is a group participant, and from the mobiles, the agent serves as the proxy of multicast services. As a result, MMROP enjoys no pac ket losses from roaming as in MIP-BT, and optimal routing efficiency as in MIP-RS. We also conducted a simulation study and developed a cost analytica l model to evaluate the performance of MMROP, in comparison to MIP-RS, MIP- BT, and MoM. The results demonstrate that MMROP has optimal routing efficie ncy, low delivery cost and high robustness, as compared to other approaches .