Data from 40 packaged software development teams are used to test a path mo
del that relates three antecedents, the presence of intragroup conflict and
the level of conflict management to software development team performance.
Findings indicate that a combination of the team's characteristics, team m
ember characteristics and existing levels of intragroup conflict accounts f
or nearly one-half of the variance between the best and worst-performing te
ams. Furthermore, the level of conflict management moderates the relationsh
ip between existing levels of intragroup conflict and performance. These re
sults highlight both the complexity of the social processes of packaged sof
tware development and the value of this perspective for gaining insight on
software development performance.