M. Hulens et al., Study of differences in peripheral muscle strength of lean versus obese women: an allometric approach, INT J OBES, 25(5), 2001, pp. 676-681
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether peripheral muscle strength is significant
ly different between lean and obese women controlled for age and physical a
ctivity, using an allometric approach.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of isometric handgrip and isokinetic leg and
trunk muscle strength.
SUBJECTS: 173 obese (age 39.9 +/- 11.4y, body mass index (BMI) 37.8 +/-5.3k
g/m(2)) and 80 lean (age 39.7 +/- 12.2 y, BMI 22.0 +/- 2.2 kg/m(2)) women.
MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric measures (weight, height) and body composition
(bioelectrical impedance method), isometric handgrip (maximal voluntary co
ntraction on the Jamar dynamometer), isokinetic trunk flexion-extension, tr
unk rotation, and knee flexion-extension (Cybex dynamometers).
RESULTS: Absolute isokinetic strength output (that is, strength uncorrected
for fat-free mass) was larger in obese compared to lean women, except for
knee flexion and isometric handgrip, which were not significantly different
(P > 0.05). Pearson correlation coefficients between strength measures and
fat-free mass (kg) were low to moderate both in lean (r = 0.28-0.53, P > 0
.05) and in obese (r = 0.29-0.49, P < 0.001) women. There was no correlatio
n with fat mass (kg) in the lean, whereas in the obese women a weak positiv
e relation could be observed for most isokinetic data (r = 0.21-0.39, P < 0
.01). When correcting for fat-free mass (raised to the optimal exponent det
ermined by allometric scaling), all strength measurements were at least 6%
lower in obese when compared to the lean women, except for trunk flexion, w
hich was at least 8% stronger in obese women.
DISCUSSION: The higher absolute knee extension strength measures of leg and
the similar extension strength of the trunk in the obese sample compared t
o the lean might be explained by the training effect of weight bearing and
support of a larger body mass. However when the independent effect of fat-f
ree mass is removed, these strength measures, as well as oblique abdominal
muscle and handgrip strength, turned out to be lower in obese women. These
observations could be the reflection of the overall impairment of physical
fitness as a consequence of obesity and its metabolic complications.