The relationship between radiation fields and regional lymph nodes in carcinoma of the breast

Citation
Rl. Goodman et al., The relationship between radiation fields and regional lymph nodes in carcinoma of the breast, INT J RAD O, 50(1), 2001, pp. 99-105
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
50
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
99 - 105
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(20010501)50:1<99:TRBRFA>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the relationships between tangential, anterior, and pos terior radiation fields and regional lymph nodes, including Levels I-III ax illary acid supraclavicular lymph nodes. Methods and Materials: Fifty-five patients underwent computed tomography (C T) scanning in the supine treatment position, add radiation fields were dev eloped to treat appropriate breast and lymphatic regions. After conventiona l fields had been selected, Levels I-III axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes were identified on multiple CT slices performed at 3-5-mm intervals and their depths to the anterior skin surface and the anterior-posterior se parations at multiple levels were measured, Results: The mean depths of the Levels I-III axillary nodes were 4.6, 5.1, and 3.6 cm, respectively, The mean depth of the supraclavicular nodes was 3 .9 cm, The mean anterior-posterior separations at these levels were 15.4, 1 5.2, 15.2, and 14.6 cm, The mean depths of the nodes, therefore, were well anterior to the midline. In the two-field treatment group, Level I axillary nodes appeared in the tangential portals in 9/9 patients, either alone or with other lymph node groups. In the three-field group, Level I axillary no des were in 16/16 tangential fields either alone or with level II nodes (8 patients). In 8 patients, Level III and the supraclavicular nodes were incl uded in the anterior field and in the other 8, Levels II, III, and the supr aclavicular nodes were in the anterior field. There was considerable variat ion in the nodal groups present in the posterior axillary boost field, No n odal groups were observed in 6 patients. Conclusion: There is considerable variation both in the depth of supraclavi cular and axillary lymph nodes and the fields in which these nodal groups a ppear. To be certain that nodal groups which one plans to treat are actuall y treated, as well as to minimize nodal treatment when such treatment is no t planned, it is recommended that before the placement of radiation fields, the nodal groups be outlined on a CT scan much as one would outline a tumo r volume in other disease sites. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.