Purpose: To analyze the results obtained in a prospective group of patients
with keloid scars treated by high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with or wi
thout surgery.
Methods and Materials: One hundred and sixty-nine patients with keloid scar
s were treated with HDR brachytherapy between December 1991 and December 19
98. One hundred and thirty-four patients were females, and 35 were males. T
he distribution of keloid scars was as follows: face, 77; trunk, 73; and ex
tremities, 19. The mean length was 4.2 cm (range 2-22 cm), and the mean wid
th 1.8 cm (range 1.0-2.8 cm). In 147 patients keloid tissues were removed b
efore HDR brachytherapy treatment, and in 22 HDR brachytherapy was used as
definitive treatment. In patients who underwent prior surgery, a flexible p
lastic tube was put in place during the surgical procedure. Bottoms were us
ed to fix the plastic tubes, and the surgical wound was repaired by absorba
ble suture. HDR brachytherapy was administered within 30-60 min of surgery.
A total dose of 12 Gy (at 1 cm from the center of the catheter) was given
in four fractions of 300 cGy in 24 h (at 09.00 am, 15.00 pm, 21.00 pm, and
09.00 am next day). Treatment was optimized using standard geometric optimi
zation. In patients who did not undergo surgery, standard brachytherapy was
performed, and plastic tubes were placed through the skin to cover the who
le scar. Local anesthesia was used in all procedures. In these patients a t
otal dose of 18 Gy was given in 6 fractions of 300 cGy in one and a half da
ys (at 9.00 am, 3.00 pm, and 9.00 pm; and at 9.00 am, 3.00 pm, and 9.00 pm
next day). No further treatment was given to any patient. Patients were see
n in follow-up visits every 3 months during the first year, every 6 months
in the second year, and yearly thereafter. No patient was lost to follow-up
. Particular attention was paid to keloid recurrence, late skin effects, an
d cosmetic results.
Results: All patients completed the treatment. After a follow-up of seven y
ears, 8 patients (4.7%) had keloid recurrences. Five of these had undergone
prior surgery (local failure rate 3.4%), and 3 had received only HDR brach
ytherapy (local persistence fate 13.6%), Cosmetic results were considered t
o be good or excellent in 130/147 patients treated with prior surgery and i
n 17/22 patients without surgery. Skin pigmentation changes were observed i
n 10 patients, and tetangiectasias in 12 patients. No late effects such as
skin atrophy or skin fibrosis were observed during the 7 years of follow-up
.
Conclusions: HDR brachytherapy is an effective treatment for keloid scars.
It is well tolerated and does not present significant side effects. The bra
chytherapy results were more successful in patients who underwent previous
surgical excision of keloid scar than in patients without surgery. We favor
HDR brachytherapy rather than superficial X-rays or low energy electron be
ams in keloid scars, because HDR provides a better selective deposit of rad
iation in tissues and a lower degree of normal tissue irradiation. Other ad
vantages of high-dose-rate brachytherapy over low-dose-rate brachytherapy a
re its low cost, the fact that it can be performed on an outpatient basis,
its excellent radiation protection, and the better dose distribution obtain
ed. From the clinical perspective, the technique provides a high local cont
rol rate without significant sequelae or complications. (C) 2001 Elsevier S
cience Inc.