In a companion study (Verbanck S, Schuermans D, Vincken W, and Paiva M, J A
ppl Physiol 90: 1754-1762, 2001), we investigated whether saline aerosol bo
lus tests could also be used to detect proximal, as opposed to peripheral,
airway alterations. We studied 10 never-smokers before and after histamine
challenge, obtaining, for various volumetric lung depths (VLD), saline bolu
s-derived indexes computed by discarding aerosol concentrations below eithe
r 50% of the exhaled bolus maximum (halfwidth, H) or below cutoffs ranging
from 5 to 25% (standard deviation, sigma (5%)-sigma (25%)) and skew (sk(5)-
sk(25%)). Multiple-breath N-2 washout-derived indexes of conductive (S-cond
) and acinar (S-acin) ventilation inhomogeneity were also determined. After
histamine, S-cond significantly increased (P = 0.008) whereas Sacin remain
ed unaffected, indicating purely conductive airway alteration. Consistent w
ith this observation, sk(5%) (or sk(25%)) was increased to the same extent
at all VLD, and sigma (5%) was increased preferentially at low VLD. By cont
rast, H and sigma (25%) displayed preferential increases at high VLD, a pat
tern similar to that induced by peripheral alterations. The present work sh
ows that proximal airway alteration can be reliably identified by saline bo
lus tests only if these include measurements at low and high VLD and if bol
us dispersion is quantified as a standard deviation with a low cutoff.