ost well-accepted etiological models of facial pain (e.g., temporomand
ibular disorders and headache) implicate emotional distress as an impo
rtant factor in the development and maintenance of pain. Data exists t
o support the notion that some facial pain sufferers are more emotiona
lly distressed than no pain controls. However, many of these dependent
measures of emotional distress are either lengthy assessment batterie
s, lack clear cut psychotherapeutic treatment implications, or focus e
xclusively on pain related sequela. As cognitive-behavioral interventi
ons become more integrated into the treatment of chronic pain conditio
ns, including various facial pain conditions, it becomes more imperati
ve that the tools used to assess psychological functioning provide the
clinician with specific cognitive/behavioral targets for change. The
purpose of this study was to assess the degree to which symptomatic tr
eatment seeking facial pain sufferers (N = 25), symptomatic non-treatm
ent seeking facial pain sufferers (N = 48), and healthy pain-free cont
rols (N = 70) differed on the Rational Beliefs Inventory (RBI). The RB
I is a reliable, valid questionnaire assessing rational beliefs that a
re operationalized within a Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) framework.
RET is a cognitive-behavioral treatment paradigm that focuses on how a
n individual's maladaptive cognitive errors or distortions exacerbate
emotional distress, Group differences were assessed using a oneway Ana
lysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with the total RBI score serving as the d
ependent measure, and a Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA)
using individual RBI belief subscales as dependent measures. These res
ults indicated that groups differed significantly on the total score a
nd several of the individual belief subscales. These findings indicate
d that facial pain sufferers generally hold maladaptive beliefs that m
ay be of clinical significance for cognitive/behavioral treatment appr
oaches.