The seismic provisions of the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC) are examined
from the perspective of achieving performance-based earthquake engineering
of structural wall buildings. It is shown that although strain limits an p
resent in the 1997 UBC, the drift ratio limits generally,govern design. The
conflict between assumed force reduction factors and actual ductility dema
nd at the design limit state controlled by drift is also explored. Through
the use of design examples and dynamic inelastic time history analysis it i
s shown that attempts to achieve performance-based engineering with a force
r-based approach such as that described in the 1997 UBC will inevitably nes
t be possible. As an alternative, it is shown that a simple and more ration
al direct displacement-based approach would better achieve the objectives o
f performance-based earthquake engineering.