Energetically most likely substrate and active-site protonation sites and pathways in the catalytic mechanism of dihydrofolate reductase

Citation
Pl. Cummins et Je. Gready, Energetically most likely substrate and active-site protonation sites and pathways in the catalytic mechanism of dihydrofolate reductase, J AM CHEM S, 123(15), 2001, pp. 3418-3428
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis",Chemistry
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00027863 → ACNP
Volume
123
Issue
15
Year of publication
2001
Pages
3418 - 3428
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-7863(20010418)123:15<3418:EMLSAA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Despite much experimental and computational study, key aspects of the mecha nism of reduction of dihydrofolate (DHF) by dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) remain unresolved, while the secondary DHFR-catalyzed reduction of folate h as been little studied. Major differences between proposed DHF mechanisms a re whether the carboxylate group of the conserved active-site Asp or Glu re sidue is protonated or ionized during the reaction, and whether there is di rect protonation of N5 or a proton shuttle from an initially protonated car boxylate group via O4. We have addressed these questions for both reduction steps with a comprehensive set of ab initio quantum chemical calculations on active site fragment complexes, including the carboxyl side chain and, p rogressively, all other polar active-site residue groups including conserve d water molecules. Addition of two protons in two steps was considered. The polarization effects of the remainder of the enzyme system were approximat ed by a dielectric continuum self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) model us ing an effective dielectric constant (epsilon) of 2. Optimized geometries w ere calculated using the density functional (B3LYP) method and Onsager SCRF model with the 6-31G* basis. Single-point energy calculations were then ca rried out at the B3LYP/6-311+G** level with either the Onsager or dielectri c polarizable continuum model. Additional checking calculations at MP2 and HF levels, or with other basis sets or values of E, were also done. From th e results, the conserved water molecule, corresponding to W206 in the E, co li DHFR complexes, that is H-bonded to both the OD2 oxygen atom of the carb oxyl (Asp) side chain and O4 of the pterin/dihydropterin ring, appears crit ically important and may determine the protonation site for the enzyme-boun d substrates. In the absence of W206, the most stable monoprotonated specie s are the neutral-pair I-enol forms of substrates with the carboxyl group O D2 oxygen protonated and H-bonded to N3. If W206 is included, then the most stable forms are still the neutral-pair complexes but now for the N3-H ket o forms with the protonated OD2 atom H-bonding with W206. A second proton a ddition to these complexes gives protonations at N8 (folate) or N5 (DHF), C alculated H-bond distances correlate well with those for the conserved W206 observed in many X-ray structures. For all structures with occluded M20 lo op conformations (closed active site), OD2-N3 distances are less than OD2-N A2 distances, which is consistent with those calculated for protonated OD2 complexes. Thus. the results (B3LYP; epsilon = 2 calculations) support a me chanism for both folate and THF reduction in which the OD2 carboxyl oxygen is first protonated, followed by a direct protonation at N8 (folate) and N5 (DHF) to obtain the active cation complexes, i.e., doubly protonated. The results do not support a proposed protonated carboxyl with DHF in the enol form for the Michaelis complex, nor an ionized carboxyl with protonated eno l-DHF as a catalytic intermediate. However, as additional calculations for the monoprotonated complete complexes show a reduction in the energy differ ences between the neutral-pair keto and ion-pair keto (N8- or NS-protonated ) forms, we are extending the treatment using combined quantum mechanics an d molecular mechanics (QM/MM) and molecular dynamics simulation methods to refine the description of the protein/solvent environment and prediction of the relative stabilization free energies of the various (OD2, O4, N5, and N8) protonation sites.