Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial

Citation
M. Eccles et al., Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial, LANCET, 357(9266), 2001, pp. 1406-1409
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
LANCET
ISSN journal
01406736 → ACNP
Volume
357
Issue
9266
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1406 - 1409
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-6736(20010505)357:9266<1406:EOAAFA>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background Radiological tests are often used by general practitioners (GPs) . These tests can be overused and contribute little to clinical management. We aimed to assess two methods of reducing GP requests for radiological te sts in accordance with the UK Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on lumbar spine and knee radiographs, practitioners (GPs), These tests can be overused contribute little to clinical management. Methods We assessed audit and feedback, and educational reminder messages i n six radiology departments and 244 general practices that they served. The study was a before and-after, pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled tri al with a 2 x 2 factorial design. A random subset of GP patients' records w ere examined for concordance with the guidelines. The main outcome measure was number of radiograph requests per 1000 patients per year. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings The effect of educational reminder messages (ie, the change in req uest rate after intervention) was an absolute change of -1.53 (95% CI -2.5 to -0.57) for lumbar spine and of -1.61 (-2.6 to -0.62) for knee radiograph s, both relative reductions of about 28%. The effect of audit and feedback was an absolute change of -0.07 (-1.3 to 0.9) for lumbar spine of 0.04 (-0. 95 to 1.03) for knee radiograph requests, both relative reductions of about 1%. Concordance between groups did not differ significantly. Interpretation 6-monthy feedback of audit data is ineffective but the routi ne attachment of educational reminder messages to radiographs is effective and does not affect quality of referrals, Any department of radiology that handles referrals from primary care could deliver this intervention to good effect.