Improving interpretation of clinical studies by use of confidence levels, clinical significance curves, and risk-benefit contours

Citation
Tp. Shakespeare et al., Improving interpretation of clinical studies by use of confidence levels, clinical significance curves, and risk-benefit contours, LANCET, 357(9265), 2001, pp. 1349-1353
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
LANCET
ISSN journal
01406736 → ACNP
Volume
357
Issue
9265
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1349 - 1353
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-6736(20010428)357:9265<1349:IIOCSB>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The process of interpreting the results of clinical studies and translating them into clinical practice is being debated, Here we examine the role of p values and confidence intervals in clinical decision-making, and draw att ention to confusion in their interpretation. To improve result reporting, w e propose the use of confidence levels and plotting of clinical significanc e curves and risk-benefit contours. These curves and contours provide degre es of probability of both the potential benefit of treatment and the detrim ent due to toxicity, Additionally, they provide clinicians with a mechanism of translating the results of studies into treatment for individual patien ts, thus improving the clinical decision-making process. We illustrate the application of these curves and contours by reference to published studies. Confidence levels, clinical significance curves, and risk-benefit contours can be easily calculated with a hand calculator or standard statistical pa ckages. We advocate their incorporation into the published results of clini cal studies.