An attempt is made to reconcile two historically important tools for the as
sessment of intelligence and the prediction of academic achievement with ex
tant theories of verbal-crystallized-knowledge aspects of adult abilities.
A study of 167 adults ranging in age from 18 to 69 reasserts the importance
of individual differences in completion test and doze test performance in
accounting for both measures of crystallized intelligence (Gc) and four sca
les of knowledge (biology, U.S. history, U.S. literature, and technology).
The completion tests were found to account for all of the variance in Gc an
d knowledge that the doze tests accounted for, and resulted in incremental
predictive validity for both domains. In addition, completion and doze test
s were found to have a suppressor effect on the relationship between Gc and
Age. We note that C. Spearman's [The nature of "Intelligence" and the prin
ciples of cognition. New York: MacMillan (1927).] assertion, namely that th
e completion test had higher correlations with intelligence than any other
measure. Our results suggest that abstract reasoning may be far less useful
in predicting learning and performance than the completion test is. (C) 20
01 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.