Aggressive immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide has improved the
outcome of major organ disease in lupus patients. Controlled trials have s
hown that pulse cyclophosphamide is the treatment of choice for patients wi
th moderate to severe proliferative nephritis. Long-term follow-up of patie
nts participating in these controlled trials suggests that combining pulse
cyclophoshamide with pulse methylprednisolone increases efficacy but not to
xicity. Retrospective case series have also shown that pulse cyclophosphami
de therapy may be effective for the management of severe or refractory to s
tandard therapy neuropsychiatric, pulmonary, cardiovascular and hematologic
disease. Pulse cyclophosphamide is associated with an increased risk for h
erpes tester infections in the short term and with sustained amenorrhea in
the long-term. Recent studies have also drawn attention to the lack of resp
onse (or incomplete response) and fare of lupus after an initial response.
In an effort to circumvent these limitations, current investigations explor
e the therapeutic potential of high-dose, immunoablative cyclophosphamide t
herapy or tow-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with nucleoside analogs
or biologic response modifiers.