Body composition estimates from multicomponent models using BIA to determine body water

Citation
Em. Evans et al., Body composition estimates from multicomponent models using BIA to determine body water, MED SCI SPT, 33(5), 2001, pp. 839-845
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
ISSN journal
01959131 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
839 - 845
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(200105)33:5<839:BCEFMM>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of body fat (%B F) from three- and four-component models with total body water (TBW) determ ined by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA; %BF3C-BIA a nd %BF4C-BIA) to %BF estimates from densitometry (%BF2C-D) and from three- and four-component models with TBW determined using deuterium dilution (%BF 3C-D2O and %BF4C-D2O), the criterion methods. Methods: Measures of body den sity by hydrostatic weighing, TBW by BIA and D2O dilution, and bone mineral by dual energy x-raf absorptiometry (DXA) were obtained in 40 men and 93 w omen, 18-42 yr. TBW was estimated from BIA resistance (RJL analyzer) using an equation developed and cross-validated in two independent samples. Body fat was estimated using the three-component model of Siri (1961) and a four -component model modified from Lohman (1986). Results: There was a strong r elation and no significant difference between TBW estimated by BIA and D2O [r = 0.94, SEE = 2.4; (X) over bar (Diff) = 0.0 +/- 2.4 L (SB), P > 0.05]. There were strong relations between methods fur estimating %BF, with deviat ions from %BF4C-D2O (errors) for %BF3C-BIA [r = 0.99, SEE - 2.4% BF, (X) ov er bar (Diff) = -0.4 +/- 2.4% BF (SD)] and %BF4C-BIA [r = 0.99, SEE = 2.3% BF, (X) over bar (Diff) = 0.2 +/- 2.3% BF (SD)] being nonsignificant (P > 0 .05) although greater than for %BF3C-D2O [r = 1.00, SEE = 0.5% BF, (X) over bar (Diff) = -0.6 +/- 0.5% BF (SD)], and comparable or slightly worse than for %BF2C-D [r = 0.99, SEE = 2.3% BF, (X) over bar (Diff) = 0.4 +/- 2.3% B F (SD)]. Conclusions: We conclude that because estimates of %BF from multic omponent models with TBW estimated from BIA are not more accurate than from body density alone using a two-component model, estimates of %BF from thre e- and four-component models using TBWBIA are not acceptable substitutes fo r estimates from the same models using TBWD2O.