Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of body fat (%B
F) from three- and four-component models with total body water (TBW) determ
ined by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA; %BF3C-BIA a
nd %BF4C-BIA) to %BF estimates from densitometry (%BF2C-D) and from three-
and four-component models with TBW determined using deuterium dilution (%BF
3C-D2O and %BF4C-D2O), the criterion methods. Methods: Measures of body den
sity by hydrostatic weighing, TBW by BIA and D2O dilution, and bone mineral
by dual energy x-raf absorptiometry (DXA) were obtained in 40 men and 93 w
omen, 18-42 yr. TBW was estimated from BIA resistance (RJL analyzer) using
an equation developed and cross-validated in two independent samples. Body
fat was estimated using the three-component model of Siri (1961) and a four
-component model modified from Lohman (1986). Results: There was a strong r
elation and no significant difference between TBW estimated by BIA and D2O
[r = 0.94, SEE = 2.4; (X) over bar (Diff) = 0.0 +/- 2.4 L (SB), P > 0.05].
There were strong relations between methods fur estimating %BF, with deviat
ions from %BF4C-D2O (errors) for %BF3C-BIA [r = 0.99, SEE - 2.4% BF, (X) ov
er bar (Diff) = -0.4 +/- 2.4% BF (SD)] and %BF4C-BIA [r = 0.99, SEE = 2.3%
BF, (X) over bar (Diff) = 0.2 +/- 2.3% BF (SD)] being nonsignificant (P > 0
.05) although greater than for %BF3C-D2O [r = 1.00, SEE = 0.5% BF, (X) over
bar (Diff) = -0.6 +/- 0.5% BF (SD)], and comparable or slightly worse than
for %BF2C-D [r = 0.99, SEE = 2.3% BF, (X) over bar (Diff) = 0.4 +/- 2.3% B
F (SD)]. Conclusions: We conclude that because estimates of %BF from multic
omponent models with TBW estimated from BIA are not more accurate than from
body density alone using a two-component model, estimates of %BF from thre
e- and four-component models using TBWBIA are not acceptable substitutes fo
r estimates from the same models using TBWD2O.