The aim of this study was to use a systematic schedule, including urodynami
cs, to describe the rate of coexisting overactive bladder (OB) in patients
with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasi
a (BPH). We also identified differences between the patients with pure BOO
compared with those with BOO combined with OB (BOO + OB). One hundred and s
ixty-two men referred to our clinic due to LUTS were included. Patients wit
h a history that might affect their bladder function were excluded. After c
ystometry and pressure-Row studies, the patients were divided into pure BOO
and BOO + OB. Of the 162 men, 55% had pure BOO. BOO + OB was found in 45%.
Age, s-PSA, voided volume, and obstruction grade differed significantly be
tween the groups. The patients with BOO + OB were older, had a higher s-PSA
, voided smaller volumes, and were more obstructed. We found no differences
in TRUS-volume. Q-max, IPS score, or PVR. There was a strong association b
etween OB and BOG, the percentage of OB increasing with increased obstructi
on. TRUS-volume, Q-max, IPS score, and PVR did not predict whether the pati
ents had a combined BOO + OB or not. These findings indicate that BOO is a
progressive disease, which in time causes pronounced obstruction and perhap
s in itself contributes to the development of OB. Neurourol. Urodynam. 20:2
37-247, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.