In recent years, several techniques have been developed to measure implicit
social cognition. Despite their increased use, little attention has been d
evoted to their reliability and validity. This article undertakes a direct
assessment of the interitem consistency, stability, and convergent validity
of some implicit attitude measures. Attitudes toward blacks and whites wer
e measured on four separate occasions, each 2 weeks apart, using three rela
tively implicit measures (response-window evaluative priming, the Implicit
Association Test, and the response-window Implicit Association Test) and on
e explicit measure (Modern Racism Scale). After correcting for interitem in
consistency with latent variable analyses, we found that (a) stability indi
ces improved and (b) implicit measures were substantially correlated with e
ach other, forming a single latent factor. The psychometric properties of r
esponse-latency implicit measures have greater integrity than recently sugg
ested.