Negative priming has traditionally been viewed as a reflection of an inhibi
tory mechanism of attention. However, recent accounts have suggested that n
egative priming does not reflect inhibitory mechanisms. Rather, slowed reac
tion times on negative priming trials are either due to retrieval of incomp
atible response tags or of mismatching perceptual information, or due to ex
tra processes needed to distinguish past from present information. In contr
ast, it is proposed that there is no firm evidence to discount inhibition m
odels. In fact, although retrieval processes can be implicated in negative
priming effects, understanding of these requires consideration of the inhib
itory processes involved in selecting information for goal-directed behavio
ur.