The results of three population-based studies on violence against women in
Nicaragua are compared in this article. Two of the studies were regional in
scope (Leon and Managua) and focused specifically on women's experiences o
f violence, whereas the third study was a Demographic and Health Survey (DH
S) conducted with a nationally representative sample of women. The lifetime
prevalence estimates for women's undergoing physical violence fi from a pa
rtner were significantly higher in the Leon stimy (52 percent) and Managua
study (69 percent), compared with that given in tile DHS (28 percent). Poss
ible explanations for the differences al e examined through pooled multivar
iate logistic regression analysis, as well as analysis of six focus-group d
iscussions carried out with field-workers and staff from the three studies.
The most important differences that were found concerned ethical and safet
y procedures and the interview setting. The results indicate that prevalenc
e estimates for violence are highly sensitive to methodological factors, an
d that underreporting is a significant threat to validity.