Background and objective: Patients with community-acquired pneumonia can be
allocated into low and high-risk mortality groups by simple clinical crite
ria.
We studied the value of the stratification for outcome as proposed by Fine,
et al. to guide the decision for in-hospital versus outpatient treatment i
n the emergency department.
Patients and methods: We studied demographic data, risk group stratificatio
n and decision-making for in-hospital versus outpatient treatment in 101 co
nsecutive medical emergency department patients with community-acquired pne
umonia. We also analysed predictive factors for hospitalisation of low-risk
patients. We obtained complete 30 day follow-up information.
Results: Forty-three of 44 high-risk patients were hospitalised after medic
al emergency department triage. Twenty-seven (47%) of 57 low-risk patients
were hospitalised as well. Based on routine clinical assessment, hospitalis
ation of low-risk patients was required for poor medical condition or sever
e pneumonia (67%), for lack of social support (15%) and for relevant comorb
idity (18%). In an univariate analysis, age (p = 0.003), C-reactive protein
(p = 0.0006), presence of comorbidity (p = 0.0001), Charlson index (p = 0.
0001) and active oral steroid treatment (p = 0.028) were significantly corr
elated with hospitalisation of low-risk patients.
The 30-day mortality rate was 32% in patients allocated to the high-risk gr
oup at the time of diagnosis in the emergency department, compared to 0% in
low-risk patients.
Conclusions: Simple clinical criteria distinguish well between low and high
30-day-mortality risk in patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumo
nia. Nevertheless, 47% of low-risk patients require in-hospital treatment.
Age, C-reactive protein, presence of comorbidity and steroid treatment are
significantly correlated with hospitalisation of low-risk patients with com
munity-acquired pneumonia.