The degree to which clinical perceptions of Papanicolaou smear sensitivity
contribute to patient mismanagement is uncertain. A voluntary, anonymous qu
estionnaire was mailed to 350 obstetricians/gynecologists (OGYNs) and 350 o
ther primary care providers (PCPs) located in Pennsylvania or Ohio. The cli
nicians estimated the probability of no disease, dysplasia, and invasive ca
rcinoma for 1 of 7 Bethesda System diagnoses. Differences in probability es
timates between provider types and between the clinicians and medical liter
ature data were measured. The response rate was 22.7%. Compared with publis
hed values, clinicians estimated similar disease probabilities for many dia
gnoses. However; for some diagnoses, the probability estimates differed con
siderably from published values (eg, overestimation of dysplasia and invasi
ve carcinoma for benign diagnoses and underestimation of dysplasia for some
dysplasia diagnoses), and such errors could contribute to patient mismanag
ement. OGYNs generally were more accurate in probability estimates than PCP
s. Methods to convey more accurately these diagnostic disease probabilities
should he examined.