Rh. Hruban et al., Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia - A new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions, AM J SURG P, 25(5), 2001, pp. 579-586
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Proliferative epithelial lesions in the smaller caliber pancreatic ducts an
d ductules have been the subject of numerous morphologic, clinical, and gen
etic studies; however, a standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for
classifying these lesion have not been established. To evaluate the uniform
ity of existing systems for grading duct lesions in the pancreas, 35 micros
copic slides with 35 representative duct lesions were sent to eight expert
pathologists from the United States, Canada. and Europe. Kappa values for i
nterobserver agreement could not be calculated initially because more than
70 different diagnostic terms were used by the eight pathologists. In sever
al cases, the diagnoses rendered for a single duct lesion ranged from "hype
rplasia," to "metaplasia," to "dysplasia," to "carcinoma in situ." This rev
iew therefore demonstrated the need for a standard nomenclature and classif
ication system. Subsequently, during a working group meeting, the pathologi
sts agreed to adopt a single standard system. The terminology pancreatic in
traepithelial neoplasia (or PanIN) was selected, and diagnostic criteria fo
r each grade of PanIN were established (http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_p
anin This new system was then evaluated by having the eight pathologists re
review the original 35 cases. Only seven different diagnoses were rendered.
and kappa values of 0.43, 0.14, and 0.42 were obtained for PanINs 1, 2. an
d 3 respectively. Cases assigned other diagnoses (e.g., squamous metaplasia
) collectively had a kappa value of 0.41. These results show both the poten
tial of the classification system, and also the difficulty of classifying t
hese lesions even with a consistent nomenclature. However, even when there
is lack of consensus, having a restricted set of descriptions and terms all
ows a better understanding of the reasons for disagreement. It is suggested
that we adopt and apply this system uniformly, with continued study of its
reliability and use, and possibly further refinement. The acceptance of a
standard classification system will facilitate the study of pancreatic duct
lesions, and will lead ultimately to a better understanding of their biolo
gic importance.