Randomised controlled trial of prophylactic etamsylate: follow up at 2 years of age

Citation
D. Elbourne et al., Randomised controlled trial of prophylactic etamsylate: follow up at 2 years of age, ARCH DIS CH, 84(3), 2001, pp. F183-F187
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
ISSN journal
00039888 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
F183 - F187
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9888(200105)84:3<F183:RCTOPE>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Aim-To assess the role of etamsylate* in reducing the risk of haemorrhagic brain damage and its consequences. Design-Follow up of babies recruited into a randomised controlled trial. Methods-A total of 334 infants born before 33 weeks gestation in France and Greece were randomly allocated within the first four hours of birth either to receive etamsylate or to act as controls. The principal outcomes in the trial were death or impairment and/or disability at the age of 2 years. Results-Fifty nine children were lost to follow up. A total of 115 (34%) ei ther died or had some impairment or disability, and 88 (26%) either died or had severe impairment or disability at 2 years of age. These outcomes did not differ significantly between the two randomised groups: relative risks and 95% confidence intervals 1.14 (0.78 to 1.4) and 1.17 (0.82 to 1.68) res pectively. The findings were similar for all the prespecified subgroup anal yses stratified by key prognostic factors at trial entry: country of birth, gestational age < or <greater than or equal to> 29 weeks, inborn or outbor n, age < or <greater than or equal to> 1 lour, and with or without cerebral scan abnormality. Conclusion-These findings do not support the use of etamsylate. Other strat egies need to be evaluated for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in these vulnerable infants.