The acute toxic effects of hydrogen sulfide have been known for decades. Ho
wever, studies investigating the adverse health effects from chronic, low-l
evel exposure to this chemical are limited. In this study, the authors comp
ared symptoms of adverse health effects, reported by residents of two commu
nities exposed mainly to chronic, low-levels of industrial sources of hydro
gen sulfide, to health effects reported by residents in three reference com
munities in which there were no known industrial sources of hydrogen sulfid
e. Trained interviewers used a specially created, menu-driven computer ques
tionnaire to conduct a multi-symptom hearth survey. The data-collection pro
cess and questions were essentially the same in the reference and exposed c
ommunities. The two exposed communities responded very similarly to questio
ns about the major categories. When the authors compared responses of the e
xposed communities with those of the reference communities, 9 of the 12 sym
ptom categories had iterated odds ratios greater than 3.0. The symptoms rel
ated to the central nervous system had the highest iterated odds ratio (i.e
., 12.7; 95% confidence interval = 7.59, 22.09), followed by the respirator
y category (odds ratio = 11.92; 95% confidence interval = 6.03, 25.72), and
the blood category (odds ratio = 8.07; 95% confidence interval = 3.64, 21.
18). Within the broader health categories, individual symptoms were also el
evated significantly. This study, like all community-based studies, had sev
eral inherent limitations. Limitations, and the procedures the authors used
to minimize their effects on the study outcomes, are discussed. The result
s of this study emphasize the need for further studies on the adverse healt
h effects related to long-term, chronic exposure to hydrogen sulfide.