Randomized trial of breastfeeding support in very low-birth-weight infants

Citation
J. Pinelli et al., Randomized trial of breastfeeding support in very low-birth-weight infants, ARCH PED AD, 155(5), 2001, pp. 548-553
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10724710 → ACNP
Volume
155
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
548 - 553
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-4710(200105)155:5<548:RTOBSI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Objective: To determine if supplementary structured breastfeeding counselin g (SSBC) for both parents compared with conventional hospital breastfeeding support (CHBS) improves the duration of breastfeeding in very low-birth-we ight infants up to 1 year old. Design: Randomized trial with longitudinal follow-up of infants at term, an d ages 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (infant ages corrected for prematurity). Setting: A tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and geographi cally defined region in central-west (Ontario, Canada. Participants: Parents of infants with a birth weight less than 1500 g, who planned to breastfeed. Interventions: The SSBC consisted of viewing a video on breastfeeding for p reterm infants; individual counseling by the research lactation consultant; weekly personal contact in the hospital; and frequent postdischarge contac t through the infants' first year or until breast-feeding was discontinued. The CHBS group had standard breastfeeding support from regular staff membe rs confined to the period of hospitalization in the NICU. Main Outcome Measure: Duration of breastfeeding. Results: At study entry, there were no statistically significant difference s in major demographic characteristics between groups. The mean duration of breastfeeding was 26.1 weeks (SD=20.8; median, 17.4) in the SSBC group and 24.0 weeks (SD=20.5; median, 17.4) in the CHBS group (not statistically si gnificant). Conclusions: Long-term breastfeeding counseling of parents of very low-birt h-weight infants in this study did not demonstrate a significant difference in duration of breastfeeding, These results may be explained by the high m otivation to breastfeed in both groups, a relatively advantaged population, and the availability of community breastfeeding resources, which may have diminished any significant differences that could have resulted from a brea stfeeding intervention. The results of this study, compared with previous s tudies of very low-birth-weight infants, indicate a new trend to longer dur ation of breastfeeding in preterm infants.