Both biological and man-made motor control networks require input from sens
ors to allow for modification of the motor program. Real sensory neurons ar
e more flexible than typical robotic sensors because they are dynamic rathe
r than static. The membrane properties of neurons and hence their excitabil
ity can be modified by the presence of neuromodulatory substances. In the c
ase of a sensory neuron, this can change, in a functionally significant way
, the code used to describe a stimulus. For instance, extension of the neur
on's dynamic range or modification of its filtering characteristics can res
ult. This flexibility has an apparent cost. The code used may be situation-
dependent and hence difficult to interpret. To address this issue and to un
derstand how neuromodulation is used effectively in a motor control network
, I am studying the GPR2 stretch receptor in the crustacean stomatogastric
nervous system. Several different neuromodulatory substances can modify its
encoding properties. Comparisons of physiological and anatomical evidence
suggest that neuromodulation can be effected both by GPR2 itself and by oth
er neurons in the network. These results suggest that the analog of neuromo
dulation might be useful for improving sensor performance in an artificial
motor control system.