S. Miller et al., Comparison of spinal myotatic reflexes in human adults investigated with cross-correlation and signal averaging methods, BRAIN RES, 899(1-2), 2001, pp. 47-65
A cross-correlation method for recording spinal myotatic reflexes has been
developed to meet the need for brief test periods in babies and children an
d subjects with central neurological pathology. In normal adult subjects th
e method has been validated by comparing excitatory and inhibitory reflexes
obtained with cross-correlation with those obtained with conventional sign
al averaging. In the cross-correlation method a pseudo-random binary sequen
ce of 64 brief tendon taps was delivered in <1.5 s, and in the averaging me
thod 20-150 taps at one per second. The reflexes were expressed as unit imp
ulse responses to enable direct, quantitative comparisons to be made. With
cross-correlation the responses were slightly expanded in time, had lower p
eak amplitudes, and onset latencies advanced by 10 ms, the clock period of
the pseudo-random binary sequence. The amplitude of biceps phasic stretch r
eflex increased with muscle contraction in a similar manner with both metho
ds. In tests for stationarity the amplitude of biceps phasic stretch reflex
varied <10% in the first six repeats of the pseudo-random binary sequence.
The tap force required at threshold for cross-correlation was approximatel
y half that for averaging, but with both methods the magnitude of biceps ph
asic stretch reflex varied linearly with tap force over the range of one to
two times threshold. The validity of responses obtained with cross-correla
tion was assessed by a statistical procedure. In conclusion, the cross-corr
elation method is robust and gives similar results to those obtained with a
veraging. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.