This essay attempts to outline the intertextuality between Cervantes' criti
que of verisimilitude and Spain's "new comedy," which culminates in the ske
pticism and meta-representation of Calderon's stage. Cervantes' attachment
to the neo-Aristotelian precept of verisimilitude is ironic, paradoxical, a
nd equivocal, forcing the reader to distinguish between the writing of pres
umably verisimilar texts(Numancia) and the writing of texts that are presum
ably implausible(Coloquio). The author's interweaving of the verisimilar an
d the implausible, challenges the reader to enter a world of writing that l
ies beyond the boundaries of truth and falsehood imposed by contemporary pr
eceptists. Spain's "new comedy" would reread the Cervantine practice of ver
isimilitude as a stage between truth and falsehood. It would also amplify t
he sense of self-reflexivity and self-parody that abounds in Cervantine tex
ts by constructing a stage that became fully meta-representational. The ess
ay ultimately hopes to demonstrate how intertextuality as a function of ver
isimilitude may offer a theoretical possibility toward a better understandi
ng of Cervantes' role as interlocutor with Spain's "new comedy."