Evaluation of the performance and clinical impact of a rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay in conjunction with preoperative imaging and concise parathyroidectomy
Lr. Johnson et al., Evaluation of the performance and clinical impact of a rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay in conjunction with preoperative imaging and concise parathyroidectomy, CLIN CHEM, 47(5), 2001, pp. 919-925
Background: Tc-99m-sestamibi scans and rapid, intraoperative intact parathy
roid hormone (PTH) assays allow preoperative identification of diseased gla
nds and intraoperative confirmation of diseased gland removal, respectively
. Use of these two new technologies may facilitate simpler, more concise su
rgery, shorter hospital stays, and decreased costs for frozen-section analy
sis. One major drawback to this new strategy has been the high cost of rapi
d point-of-care PTH assays.
Methods: We performed rapid PTH assays with the DPC Turbo PTH assay on the
DPC IMMULITE automated analyzer. The number of intraoperative frozen sectio
ns, type of anesthesia, surgical approach, length of hospital stay, and pre
- and postoperative calcium values were compared between a group of 49 pati
ents undergoing parathyroidectomy where the intraoperative PTH assay was us
ed in conjunction with preoperative imaging, and a historical control group
of 55 patients before the use of these two technologies in our institution
.
Results: Comparison of the Turbo PTH assay to the standard IMMULITE PTH ass
ay gave the following: y = 1.08x - 4.36 (I = 0.97; n = 48). For the 49 pati
ents, the median turnaround time for each intraoperative PTH determination
was 19 min (range, 14-40 min). The median decrease in PTH values from basel
ine was 88% (range, 33-99%). Thirty-seven patients required two PTH determi
nations, 7 required three, 4 had four, and 1 required five determinations.
The average laboratory cost for the rapid intraoperative PTH assays was < $
100 per patient (range, $55 to $113). Compared with the control group, the
experimental group had significantly fewer frozen sections (1.4 vs 2.5; P <
0.0001), shorter hospital stays (17 discharged on the day of surgery vs non
e discharged on the day of surgery; P <0.0001), greater use of local anesth
esia (33% vs 0%; P <less than>0.001), and more unilateral, rather than bila
teral neck explorations (65% vs 0%; P <0.001).
Conclusions: The combination of intraoperative Turbo PTH assay and preopera
tive Tc-99m-sestamibi scans can lead to significant decreases in laboratory
and surgical pathology costs, hospital stays, and exposure to general anes
thesia by facilitating concise parathyroidectomy surgery. (C) 2001 American
Association for Clinical Chemistry.