Rationale: Home Artificial Nutrition (HAN) has been an expanding area over
the last 30 years. HAN programs have been often developed prior to the regu
lation by the National Health Systems (NHS) leading to different policies w
ithin European countries. The aim of this study was to compare legislation
regarding HAN in Europe.
Method:The Group elaborated two structured questionnaires tone for Home Ent
eral Nutrition - HEN - and one for Home Parenteral Nutrition - HPN) which w
ere presented to all the members of the MAN-Working group and to the 21 ESP
EN Council members.
Results:Twelve questionnaires were returned, covering for more than 375 mil
lion inhabitants. HEN: regulated in seven countries, Italy and France being
the first to implement reimbursement policy in 1988. Except in France, Cro
atia and the Czech Rep almost any physician can prescribe HEN. NHS totally
or partially fund HEN, although in Austria and Israel expenses are paid for
the patients. Provision of enteral diets and equipment varies widely withi
n countries. As in HPN, most of the countries have written guidelines for h
ealth care workers and for patients. HPN: legislated in six countries, Denm
ark being the first in 1975. HPN programs are restricted to a few hospitals
and patients are followed by Nutrition Support Teams (NST). The budget for
HPN is 100% supported by NHS. Hospital pharmacy, private pharmacists and H
ome Care companies are involved in a different degree in providing and dist
ributing solutions and disposables.
Conclusions: HPN regulation preceded HEN regulation by 10-20 years. Due to
this longer experience and high level of care, HPN patients are usually fol
lowed by NST Despite different policies, funding is relatively uniform, NHS
supporting most of the expenses for HAN. ESPEN could play a key role devel
oping common standards for HAN all over Europe. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publisher
s Ltd.