New concepts to improve resolution and sensitivity of molecular cytogenetic diagnostics by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization

Citation
K. Saracoglu et al., New concepts to improve resolution and sensitivity of molecular cytogenetic diagnostics by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization, CYTOMETRY, 44(1), 2001, pp. 7-15
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CYTOMETRY
ISSN journal
01964763 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
7 - 15
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-4763(20010501)44:1<7:NCTIRA>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Background: Routine application of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridiz ation (M-FISH) technology for molecular cytogenetic diagnostics has been ha mpered by several technical limitations. First, when using chromosome-speci fic painting probes, there is a limit in cytogenetic resolution of approxim ately 2-3 Mb, which can mask hidden structural abnormalities that have a si gnificant clinical effect. Second, using whole chromosome painting probes, intrachromosomal rearrangements cannot be detected and the exact localizati on of breakpoints is often not possible. Methods: We suggest the use of multiplex-labeled region or locus- specific probes in combination with an optimal probe design to improve the sensitivi ty and resolution of the M-FISH technology. To allow the application of thi s assay in routine diagnostics, we developed a multipurpose image analysis system. Results: goldFISH was applied to the study of cryptic translocations in men tal retardation patients and to the study of high-resolution breakpoint map ping in non-small cell lung cancer patients. For an individual with mental retardation, who had an apparently normal karyotype by G-banding, m e detec ted an unbalanced translocation involving chromosomes 2 and 7. Conclusions: In combination with optimally designed probe kits, goldFISH ov ercomes most of the present limitations of the M-FISH technology and result s in virtually 100% reliability for detecting interchromosomal and intrachr omosomal rearrangements. Cytometry 44:7-15, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.