The authors present an investigation into the biomechanical functioning of
a new titanium implant for vertebral body replacement (Synex). Possible ind
ications are fractures and/or dislocations with damage of the anterior colu
mn, posttraumatic kyphosis and tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. The const
ruction must be supplemented by a stabilizing posterior or anterior implant
. For best fit and contact with adjacent end-plates, Synex is distractable
in situ. We performed comparative compression tests with Synex and MOSS ("H
arms mesh cage") on human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1). The
aim of the study was to measure the compressive strength of the vertebral
body endplate in uniaxial loading via both implants to exclude collapse of
Synex in vivo. Twelve human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1) we
re divided into two identical groups (matched pairs) according to bone mine
ral density (BMD), determined using dual-energy quantitative computed tomog
raphy (DE-QCT). The specimens were loaded with an axial compression force a
t a constant speed of 5 mm/min to failure, and the displacement was recorde
d with a continuous load-displacement curve. The mean ultimate compression
force (F-max) showed a tendency towards a higher reading for Synex: 3396 N
versus 2719 N (non-significant). The displacement until F-max was 2.9 mm in
the Synex group, which was half as far as in the MOSS group (5.8 mm). The
difference was significant (P <0.001). The compression force was twice as h
igh, and significantly (P <0.05) higher with Synex at displacements of 1 mm
, 1.5 mm and 2 mm. A significant (P <0.001) correlation (R=0.89) between F-
max and BMD was found. Synex was found to be at least comparable to MOSS co
ncerning the compressive performance at the vertebral end-plate. A possible
consequence of the significantly higher mean compression forces between an
d 2 mm displacement might be decreased collapse of the implant into the ver
tebral body in vivo.