Ys. Cheng et al., Adjuvant sclerotherapy after ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices: a prospective, randomized long-term study, GASTROIN EN, 53(6), 2001, pp. 566-571
Background: To assess the efficacy of adjuvant sclerotherapy after banding
for the treatment of esophageal varices, a randomized trial was carried out
of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) alone with sequential sclerotherapy
versus sequential ligation-sclerotherapy (SLS) after banding with respect t
o variceal eradication, associated complications, and recurrence of varices
.
Methods: One hundred patients qualified for this study. Fourteen patients w
ere not included for the following reasons: 6 chose not to participate, 4 h
ad fundal varices, and 4 had some form of cancer, Of the remaining 86 patie
nts in the study, 42 underwent EVL alone and the other 44 SLS, Variceal lig
ation was begun in the region of the gastroesophageal junction, with subseq
uent ligatures applied cephalad 3 to 5 cm; ligation was repeated every 2 we
eks until variceal obliteration. For SLS, ligation was also begun in the re
gion of the gastroesophageal junction and repeated until varices were reduc
ed to F1 size, Subsequently, these patients underwent sclerotherapy with be
tween 6 and 8 mL of sodium tetradecyl sulfate (free hand technique).
Results: No significant differences were found between EVL alone and SLS wi
th regard to variceal eradication, development of associated complications,
and recurrent bleeding during a follow-up of 2 years. The probability of v
ariceal recurrence requiring further treatment after 1 year was 14% for the
SLS group and 26% for EVL group patients, Another year later, the probabil
ity of variceal recurrence was 24% and 45%, respectively, for the SLS and E
VL groups.
Conclusions: Because a significantly lower rate of variceal recurrence was
found for SLS patients, sequential sclerotherapy followed by ligation to er
adicate those varices too small to easily band may be a better procedure.