The article asks three questions: 1) What has been the role of the sta
te in Vietnam's economic growth since 1986? 2) Will the state in its c
urrent form contribute to or impede continued economic growth? 3) Can
we draw some general conclusions from the Vietnamese case about concep
tual approaches to the role of the state in economic growth? The answe
r to the first question is that the state has played a significant rol
e by allowing entrepreneurial initiatives from below ('fence-breaking'
), attracting foreign investments, and instituting successful macro-ec
onomic control mechanisms. The answer to the second question is that t
he state in its current form, with its combination of a market economy
and a privileged state sector, provides for marketisation of the stat
e itself, i.e., rampant corruption. This will probably impede European
and American investments and will also undermine the virtue of the Vi
etnamese state-and-society, but if sufficient investments are obtained
from well-connected Asian sources, and there is enough competition be
tween companies within the state, it is possible that growth can conti
nue anyway at a rapid pace. The answers suggested to the third questio
n are that in order to understand the role of the state, we must 'unpa
ck it', look at various state institutions; stop assuming a clear divi
ding line between 'state' and 'society' or 'state' and 'market'; and t
hat we must pay close attention to how the state is operating as a com
petitive actor in the global market-place.