Background: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have gained an increased r
ole in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome within the last years. Comp
ared to unfractionated heparins LMWH are user-friendly (high bioavailabilit
y after subcutaneous application, no needed routine control of plasma effic
acy).
Results of Studies: International trials have demonstrated a comparable (da
lteparin, nadroparin) or even higher (enoxaparin) efficacy of LMWH compared
to unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with unstable angin
a or non-O; wave infarction. The use of LMWH has thereby been accompanied b
y a low rate of side effects. Enoxaparin appears to have the highest effica
cy compared with other LMWH in the acute phase of disease, but confirming "
head-to head" studies with different LMWH are lacking. A significant higher
efficacy of a prolonged treatment with LMWH compared to placebo has been s
hown in one study (FRISC-2) in unstable patients who were not treated by co
ronary intervention in the early phase of disease. This lasted for about 60
days but was associated with a higher risk of bleeding.
Future Aspects: Currently, prospective clinical trials investigate the effi
cacy of combined use of LMWH with thrombolytics, GPIIb/IIIa blockers and th
e optimal dosage of LMWH during coronary interventions.