We describe a set of criteria to evaluate the quality of data and interpret
ations in chemical interaction studies. These criteria reflect the consensu
s of the literature on interaction analysis developed over decades of resea
rch in pharmacology, toxicology, and biometry; address common pitfalls in p
ublished interaction studies; and can be easily applied to common methods o
f interaction analysis. The criteria apply broadly to interaction data for
drugs, pesticides, industrial chemicals, food additives, and natural produc
ts and are intended to assist risk assessors who must evaluate interaction
studies for use in component-based mixture risk assessments. The criteria m
ay also assist researchers interested in conducting interaction studies to
inform mixture risk assessment. The criteria are also intended to serve lar
ger scientific goals, including increasing the repeatability of results obt
ained in chemical interaction studies, enhancing the reliability of conclus
ions drawn from interaction data, providing greater consistency of interpre
tations among various analysts, and decreasing uncertainty in using interac
tion data in risk assessments. We describe the basis for each criterion and
demonstrate their utility by using them to evaluate interaction studies fr
om the recent toxicological and pharmacological literature, which serve as
examples of different types of data sets that the risk assessor may encount
er.