Recently, there has been interest in whether intakes of specific types of f
at are associated with breast cancer risk independently of other types of f
at, but results have been inconsistent. We identified 8 prospective studies
that met predefined criteria and analyzed their primary data using a stand
ardized approach. Holding total energy intake constant, we calculated relat
ive risks for increments of 5% of energy for each type of fat compared with
an equivalent amount of energy from carbohydrates or from other types of f
at. We combined study-specific relative risks using a random effects model,
In the pooled database, 7,329 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurr
ed among 351,821 women. The pooled relative risks (95% confidence intervals
[Cl]) for an increment of 5% of energy were 1.09 (1.00-1.19) for saturated
, 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for monounsaturated and 1.05 (0.96-1.16) for polyunsatur
ated fat compared with equivalent energy intake from carbohydrates, For a 5
% of energy increment, the relative risks were 1.18 (95% Cl 0.99-1.42) for
substituting saturated for monounsaturated fat, 0.98 (95% CI 0.85-1.12) for
substituting saturated for polyunsaturated fat and 0.87 (95% Cl 0.73- 1.02
) for substituting monounsaturated for polyunsaturated fat, No associations
were observed for animal or vegetable fat intakes. These associations were
not modified by menopausal status. These data are suggestive of only a wea
k positive association with substitution of saturated fat for carbohydrate
consumption; none of the other types of fat examined was significantly asso
ciated with breast cancer risk relative to an equivalent reduction in carbo
hydrate consumption, (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.