The standard method for performing electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings prese
nts a challenge to technicians because of the need to correctly position th
e individual precordial electrodes according to 6 bony thoracic landmarks.
A proposed new method using a 6-lead ECG BELT for precordial application wa
s compared to the standard method to determine the level of agreement among
automated interpretations. A comparison of automated interpretations from
repeat standard recordings served as the control. Results indicate that BEL
T and standard automated interpretations disagreed significantly more frequ
ently than repeat standard recording automated interpretations of the cardi
ac rhythm. The BELT's most obvious weakness was the inability to obtain a r
ecording with a stable ECG baseline, triggering automated detection of "bas
eline artifact or wander," and requiring a repeat recording. These findings
suggest that the ECG BELT is not adequate for clinical application in its
current form.