Past research has revealed that team effectivenesss and satisfaction suffer
when teams experience relationship conflict - conflict related to interper
sonal issues, political norms and values, and personal taste. This study ex
amined how teams should respond to these conflicts. Three types of conflict
responses were studied: collaborating responses, contending responses, and
avoiding responses. A field study involving a heterogeneous sample of team
s performing complex, non-routine task showed that collaborating and conten
ding responses to relationship conflict negatively relate to team functioni
ng (i.e., voice, compliance, helping behavior) and overall team effectivene
ss, while avoiding responses were associated with high team functioning and
effectiveness. It is suggested that collaborating and contending responses
to relationship conflict distract team members from their tasks, while avo
iding responses appear more functional in that they allow team members to p
ursue task performance. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.