Adiabatic electron affinities (AEAs) for the DNA and RNA bases are predicte
d by using a range of density functionals with a double-zeta plus polarizat
ion plus diffuse (DZP++) basis set in an effort to bracket the true EAs. Al
though the AEAs exhibit moderate fluctuations with respect to the choice of
functional, systematic trends show that the covalent uracil (U) and thymin
e (T) anions are bound by 0.05-0.25 eV while the adenine (A) anion is clear
ly unbound. The computed AEAs for cytosine (C) and guanine (G) oscillate be
tween small positive and negative values for the three most reliable functi
onal combinations (BP86, B3LYP, and BLYP), and it remains unclear if either
covalent anion is bound. AEAs with B3LYP/TZ2P++ single points are 0.19 (U)
, 0.16 (T), 0.07 (G), -0.02 (C), and -0.17 eV (A.). Favorable comparisons a
re made to experimental estimates extrapolated from photoelectron spectra d
ata for the complexes of the nucleobases with water. However, experimental
values scaled from liquid-phase reduction potentials are shown to overestim
ate the AEAs by as much as 1.5 eV. Because the uracil and thymine covalent
EAs are in energy ranges near those of their dipole-bound counterparts, pre
paration and precise experimental measurement of the thermodynamically stab
le covalent anions may prove challenging.