Mm. Ottesen et al., Consequences of overutilization and underutilization of thrombolytic therapy in clinical practice, J AM COL C, 37(6), 2001, pp. 1581-1587
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the consequences, measured
as mortality and in-hospital stroke, of the use of thrombolytic therapy am
ong patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), who do not fulfill acc
epted criteria or who have contraindications to thrombolytic therapy (i.e.,
overutilization) and among patients who are withheld thrombolytic treatmen
t despite fulfilling indications and having no contraindications (i.e., und
erutilization).
BACKGROUND The implementation of treatment with thrombolysis in clinical pr
actice is not in accordance with the accepted criteria from randomized stud
ies. The consequence has been over- and underutilization of thrombolytic th
erapy among patients with AMI in clinical practice. The outcome of overutil
ization of thrombolytic therapy has not been described previously.
METHODS We examined 6,676 consecutive patients admitted to the hospital wit
h an AMI and recorded characteristics, in-hospital complications and long-t
erm mortality.
RESULTS Overall, 41% of the patients received thrombolytic therapy. Thrombo
lytic therapy was underutilized in 14.3% and overutilized in 12.9% of the p
atients. The use of thrombolytic therapy was associated with reduced mortal
ity in every subgroup examined, including patients without an accepted indi
cation, with an accepted indication and in patients with prior stroke. The
risk ratio of in-hospital stroke was not increased in connection with throm
bolytic therapy, not even in patients with Frier stroke (relative risk = 0.
237, 95% confidence interval: 0.031 to 1.810, p = 0.17).
CONCLUSIONS With the large benefit known to be associated with thrombolytic
therapy and the favorable result of thrombolytic therapy in patients with
contraindications observed in this study, we conclude that a formal evaluat
ion of thrombolytic therapy in wider patient categories is warranted. (J Am
Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1581-7) (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiolog
y.