Confirmatory factor analysis was used to investigate the nature of memory d
istinctions underlying the performance of two samples: a sample of male Vie
tnam War veterans who had not received head injuries, and a second sample o
f male Vietnam War veterans who had suffered penetrating head injuries resu
lting in relatively small lesions (< 10 cc volume loss). For these two grou
ps, comparisons were made of the fit of seven theory-based memory models, c
omprising from one to four factors. The four-component model with a verbal-
episodic component, a visual-episodic component, a semantic component, and
a short-term memory component provided a significantly better account of me
mory performance than the others. The implications of these findings and so
me advantages of this approach as a supplement to a purely experimental app
roach to memory are discussed.