Closed-loop controlled inspired oxygen concentration for mechanically ventilated very low birth weight infants with frequent episodes of hypoxemia

Citation
N. Claure et al., Closed-loop controlled inspired oxygen concentration for mechanically ventilated very low birth weight infants with frequent episodes of hypoxemia, PEDIATRICS, 107(5), 2001, pp. 1120-1124
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
PEDIATRICS
ISSN journal
00314005 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1120 - 1124
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-4005(200105)107:5<1120:CCIOCF>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Background. Mechanically ventilated very low birth weight infants often pre sent with frequent episodes of hypoxemia, and maintaining arterial oxygen s aturation by pulse oximetry (SpO(2)) within a normal range by manual fracti on of inspired oxygen (FIO2)adjustments is difficult and time consuming. Objectives. An algorithm for closed-loop FIO2 control (cFIO(2)) to maintain SpO(2) within a target range was compared with continuous manual FIO2 (mFI O(2)) adjustments by a nurse in a group of ventilated infants who presented with frequent episodes of hypoxemia. Results. Fourteen infants (birth weight: 712 +/- 142 g; gestational age: 25 +/- 1.6 weeks; age: 26 +/- 11 days; synchronized intermittent mandatory ve ntilation rate: 24 +/- 10 b/m; peak inspiratory pressure: 17.5 +/- 2.0 cmH( 2)O; positive end-expiratory pressure: 4.3 +/- 0.5 cmH(2)O) were studied fo r 2 hours on each mode in random sequence. Both modes aimed to maintain SpO (2) between 88% and 96%. There were 15 +/- 7 and 16 6 hypoxemic episodes/hour (SpO(2) <88%, >5 s) du ring mFIO(2) and cFIO(2), respectively; episode duration was 41 +/- 23 and 32 +/- 15 s, totaling 19 +/- 16% and 17 +/- 12% of recording time. There we re 13 +/- 10 and 10 +/- 8 hyperoxemic episodes/hour (SpO(2) >96%, >5 s) dur ing mFIO(2) and cFIO(2), respectively; episode duration was 27 +/- 15 and 2 4 +/- 19 s, totaling 15 +/- 14% and 10 +/- 9% of recording time. Mean SpO(2 ) and FIO2 levels were similar during both modes. The nurse made 29 +/- 17 adjustments/hour during mFIO(2). There was a significant increase in the du ration of normoxemia (SpO(2) between 88%-96%) during cFIO(2) (75 +/- 13 vs 66 +/- 14% of recording time). Conclusion. In this group of infants, cFIO(2) was at least as effective as a fully dedicated nurse in maintaining SpO(2) within the target range, and it may be more effective than a nurse working under routine conditions. We speculate that during long-term use, cFIO(2) may save nursing time and redu ce the risks of morbidity associated with supplemental oxygen and episodes of hypo- and hyperoxemia.