M. Ivarsson et al., BILATERAL DISRUPTION OF CONDITIONED-RESPONSES AFTER UNILATERAL BLOCKADE OF CEREBELLAR OUTPUT IN THE DECEREBRATE FERRET, Journal of physiology, 502(1), 1997, pp. 189-201
1. Lesions of the cerebellar cortex can abolish classically conditione
d eyeblink responses, but some recovery with retraining has been obser
ved. It has been suggested that the recovered responses are generated
by the intact contralateral cerebellar hemisphere. In order to investi
gate this suggestion, bilaterally acquired conditioned responses were
studied after the unilateral blockade of cerebellar output. 2. Decereb
rate ferrets were trained with ipsilateral electrical forelimb stimula
tion (300 ms, 50 Hz, 1 mA) as the conditioned stimulus and bilaterally
applied peri-orbital stimulation (40 ms, 50 Hz, 3 mA) as the uncondit
ioned stimulus. The conditioned and unconditioned eyeblink responses w
ere monitored by EMG recordings from the orbicularis oculi muscle. The
output from one cerebellar hemisphere was blocked either by injecting
small amounts of lignocaine (lidocaine; 0.5-1.0 mu l) into the brachi
um conjunctivum, or by a restricted mechanical lesion of the brainstem
rostral to the cerebellum. 3. As described by previous investigators,
the unilateral blockade of cerebellar output abolished ipsilateral co
nditioned responses. 4. More importantly, such blockade also abolished
or strongly depressed contralateral conditioned responses. When mecha
nical lesions of the brachium conjunctivum were made, contralateral re
sponses, in contrast to ipsilateral responses, recovered within 1-2.5
h. 5. When the unconditioned stimulus was removed on one side, causing
extinction of conditioned responses on this side, conditioned respons
es were temporarily depressed on the trained side as well. 6. Unilater
al interruption of cerebellar output had no clear effect on contralate
ral unconditioned reflex responses. 7. The results demonstrate that on
e cerebellar hemisphere in ferrets exerts a marked control of contrala
teral conditioned eyeblink responses, probably via premotor neurones i
nvolved specifically in conditioned, and not in unconditioned, respons
es.