The two anguishes of 'Etre et Temps' and 'Unbedeutsamkeit'

Authors
Citation
Y. Corbeil, The two anguishes of 'Etre et Temps' and 'Unbedeutsamkeit', REV PHILOS, 99(1), 2001, pp. 26-45
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Philosiphy
Journal title
REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LOUVAIN
ISSN journal
00353841 → ACNP
Volume
99
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
26 - 45
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-3841(200102)99:1<26:TTAO'E>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Can phenomenology do without a phenomenality of feeling? Yes, provided that the latter is only an "accident of subjectivity" or a simple effect connec ted with the apprehension of the being. But no, from the perspective of the bringing to light of "feelings" not induced by the being, but properly det ermining for it. The "fundamental tonality" (Grundstimmung), analysed by He idegger, particularly in Being and Time, is of this latter type. It obliges phenomenology to take into account an extraordinary "lived moment", for wh ich there is no phenomenon in good and proper form. This "lesson" in phenom enology is given by Heidegger himself, especially in his classical distinct ion between anguish and fear. But it is uncertain if this distinction is no t already required within anguish itself.