All retroviruses possess a highly error-prone reverse transcriptase, but th
e extent of the consequent sequence diversity and the rate of evolution dif
fer greatly among retroviruses. Because of the high mutability of retroviru
ses, it is not the generation of new viral variants that Limits the extent
of diversity and the rate of evolution of retroviruses, but rather the sele
ction forces that act on these variants. Here, we suggest that two selectio
n forces-the immune response and the limited availability of appropriate ta
rget cells during transmission and persistence-are chiefly responsible for
the observed sequence diversity in untreated retroviral infections. We illu
strate these aspects of positive selection by reference to specific lentivi
ruses [human and simian immunodeficiency viruses (HIV and SIV)] and oncovir
uses [feline Leukemia virus (FeLV) and human T cell Leukemia virus (HTLV)]
that differ in their extent of variation and in disease outcomes.