Based on a conjugation of a political economy of health services approach a
nd a critical phenomenology of suffering, American critical medical anthrop
ology suggests to set the contributions of anthropology to epidemiology in
the arena of the study of structural, political and economic, causes of ill
ness. In order to keep its credibility, anthropology must take up the chall
enge of a creative linkage between an interpretativist analysis of illness
local meanings and a critical analysis of the asymmetric social and economi
c relationships that partly explain variations in its prevalence and incide
nce. Based on data from a research project on the causes of psychological d
istress and social suffering in Martinique, this paper suggests that a crit
ical ethnoepidemiology of distress should be able to face such a challenge.
It means that it will have to study the articulation between three levels
of determinants: a) the postcolonial macro-societal structures that reinfor
ces the political and economical dependency of Martinique; b) at an interme
diate level, the daily living conditions (i.e. underemployment, intrafamili
al conflicts) and c) at the cultural level, the collective identity stigmat
a caused by colonialism and the anxieties generated by witchcraft practices
and "quimbois". This redefinition of the anthropological endeavour at the
crossroads of micro-social and macro-societal level of analysis is proposed
as a means to counter the risk of medicalisation of medical anthropology.