The epidemiology of recurrent pregnancy loss

Citation
Dw. Cramer et La. Wise, The epidemiology of recurrent pregnancy loss, SEMIN REP M, 18(4), 2000, pp. 331-339
Citations number
85
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
15268004 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
331 - 339
Database
ISI
SICI code
1526-8004(2000)18:4<331:TEORPL>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
In reviewing the epidemiology of recurrent abortion (RAB), we believe it is necessary to consider the epidemiology of spontaneous abortion (SAB) as we ll, since it is clear that even a single pregnancy loss increases the risk for a subsequent abortion. In addition, any attempt to identify, epidemiolo gic risk factors for SAB or RAB must deal with the fact that at least 50% o f SABs are associated with genetic abnormalities. Given that most epidemiol ogic studies have nor distinguished karyotypically abnormal abortuses, risk factors are likely to be underestimated. Nevertheless, there is fair agree ment that a variety of factors may increase risk for SAB or RAB, including advanced maternal age, single gene mutations such as PKU or G6PD deficiency , structural abnormalities of the uterus, poorly controlled diabetes, antip hospholipid syndrome, and smoking. More controversial is the role of luteal phase defect or hyperandrogenism, alloimmune factors, genital infections, caffeine or alcohol use, and trace element or chemical exposure from ray wa ter or in the workplace. Besides better designed epidemiologic studies to d etect modifiable risk factors for SAB or RAB, there is a clear need for cli nical trials of therapy for RAB which meet minimum epidemiologic standards including randomization, double-blinded (when possible), and placebo-contro lled (when ethical).