Comparison of two pH meters used for skin surface pH measurement: the pH meter 'pH900' from Courage & Khazaka versus the pH meter '1140' from MettlerToledo
C. Ehlers et al., Comparison of two pH meters used for skin surface pH measurement: the pH meter 'pH900' from Courage & Khazaka versus the pH meter '1140' from MettlerToledo, SKIN RES TE, 7(2), 2001, pp. 84-89
Background/aims: Measurement of skin surface pH is used in clinical researc
h to evaluate hazardous shifts in pH following external exposures and to ev
aluate the state of diseased skin with acute or chronic changes. It is ther
efore important to measure skin surface pH as precisely as possible. The ai
m of this study was to compare two commercially available pH meters used fo
r skin surface pH measurement, to reveal differences between them in measur
ed skin pH on the forearm.
Methods: The first pH meter (pH900) had a pointed electrode and a stabilisa
tion period of 3 s. The second pH meter (pH meter 1140) had a circular elec
trode and no fixed stabilisation period. Twelve healthy subjects (6 male an
d 6 female Caucasians) entered the study. The pH measurements were performe
d once an hour from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. on both forearms in five areas from th
e elbow to the "wristwatch" zone. In each area. three measurements were per
formed next to each other with both pH meters (15 measurements per arm per
hour per pH meter).
Results: The pH900 has a higher measuring level and a higher variation than
the pH meter 1140.
Conclusion: A skin surface pH meter with a circular electrode and with no f
ixed stabilisation period is preferable. It is recommended that the pH mete
r be allowed to stabilise for at least 7 s before the result is read.